Engineered Viruses Created in Government Labs Validate Mass Vaccinations

By Susanne Posel
theintelhub.com

Canadian researchers have concluded that the H1N1 flu shot is more dangerous than the flu it purports to protect against.

The timing of this study’s release coincided with North American and certain parts of Europe preparing to promote massive vaccination efforts on their citizens.

Under a propaganda pandemic campaign to fear the public into having the inoculation, this study has placed a snag in their plans.

At the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, (ICAAC) study author Dr. Danuta Skowronski explained that in 2008 a study she co-authored proved that the flu shot caused more physiological issues than the H1N1 flu itself.

Skowronski explained that “pandemics are infrequent occurrences, but seasonal influenza recurs on an annual basis. It’s a substantial cause of morbidity and mortality and the seasonal vaccine substantially protects against that severe outcome due to seasonal influenza.”

Vaccinations for the H1N1 are ineffective because the inoculation cannot prevent infection or support the body’s development of immunity. However, having been exposed to the flu gives the human body the antibody build-up that facilitates the actions of the human immune system.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a warning last month to parents to have their children vaccinated against H3N2 which is a new strain of flu that the US government is purveying against the public.

County fairs and exposure to pigs is being touted as the cause of the contraction of H3N2.

Tom Skinner, CDC spokesperson said that cases reported involved pigs however, “we’re not seeing any sustained transmission human to human, but we’re keeping an eye out.”

Skinner added, without substantial evidence, that this new mysterious strain could mutate genes and cause it to be more contiguous. And because of this new strain, vaccinations must be administered to the general public “to keep them safe.”

More bird flu fear-mongering of an epidemic that never was came to the public last June when it was reported that H5N1 was allegedly spreading “rapidly between humans.”

This study focused on how an epidemic is created and development of drugs to subvert a pandemic. Mutations enabling H5N1 to transmit human to human shows a genetic difference in this strain when compared to other viruses.

When inspected, this strain showed signs of being genetically engineered, according to a research team from Cambridge University.

A genetically engineered virus being passed off as the validation for mass vaccinations is the hallmark of a bioweapon with an agenda.

To validate the threat of bird flu to the public, officials at the Department of Natural Resources in Ontario, Canada decided to massacre hundreds of pelicans, gulls, herons and egrets back in August of this year.

The dangers of vaccines have been covered up by the pharmaceutical corporation’s endless push and claims that widespread public concerns are unfounded.

As with the push for young girls to have the Gardasil vaccine, there has not been inconclusive evidence that the vaccine prevents cervical cancer. Furthermore, the infection it claims to protect against, the human papillomavirusm (HPV) does not cause cervical cancer.

HPV is a co-infection of several bacteria combined (such as Epstein Bar virus and Chlamydia).

The CDC has stated that the human immune system will clear HPV within 2 years and that it is not a life threatening virus that would warrant being vaccinated against. Also, dietary combinations can reverse the effects of HPV more readily than the inoculation.

Covering up the deadly and dangerous effects of vaccines has become socially acceptable and rendered to citizens as well as drug corporations.

With one anonymous complaint to a website in the UK, factual information showing a direct link to the MMR vaccine and autism was scrubbed.

The information posted on the Babyjabs website also referred to the MMR having been found with live strains of the virus which translated into the inoculated children’s brain and gut where the effects of autism are manifested

According to Dr. Richard Halvorsen, author of “The Truth About Vaccines”:

“If one in 800 MMR vaccinations triggered an autistic disorder, this would result in around 1,200 children a year in the UK being made autistic by the bundling of the vaccines. This is probably the worst case scenario.”

However, because the World Health Organization (WHO) does not recognize this evidence, it is purveyed as supposition and therefore reduced to misinformation in the public domain. This is evidence of the power of the global Elite over our belief systems.

The CDC recommends that the Hepatitis-B vaccine (HBV) be given to infants from the age of 0-6 months regardless of evidence to that shows this practice is detrimental to the infant’s life.

Newborns are at a greater risk of immune compromise when bombarded with vaccinations. These chemicals impair their ability to develop strong immune systems.

The HBV has been linked to liver failure as well as liver cell death based on a mutation that occurs because of the body’s exposure to the vaccine.

The FDA approved mercury-based preservative thimerosal is directly linked to neurological disorders in children.

Dr. David Geier found that there is a direct link between “mercury exposure from Thimerosal-preserved biological products (vaccines and Rho(D) products) and mercury poisoning diagnosed as an autism spectrum disorder (ASD).”

The focus on eradicating polio with vaccines has produced a by-product. The advent of non-polio paralysis has become an epidemic that has been directly correlated with the use of the oral polio vaccine.

In India, where the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, (BMGF) along with the WHO, vaccinated thousands of children with the polio vaccine, a large amount of vaccinated kids showed a development of non-polio paralysis.

An estimated 47,500 children were affected by the efforts of BMGF and WHO.

BMGF were also involved in the deaths of thousands of Pakistani children when they and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations (GAVI) inoculated against polio which subsequently caused those children to die of non-polio paralysis.

Dr. Susanne Humphries explains that the curious development of non-polio paralysis coinciding with the polio inoculations is a phenomenon to be scrutinized. The emergence of this reaction to contaminants in the polio vaccine is causing a manufactured epidemic that is depopulating the regions affected by killing small children who are the next generation.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

Minor Editing by Alex Thomas

45-Day Old Baby Dies After Being Given Hepatitis B Vaccine

(NDTV)   One more child died today due to suspected complications following administering of Hepatitis B vaccine at a local hospital, taking the toll to four in similar cases in Karnataka in the last two days.

According to police, 45-day old baby girl Dhanya Gopal Siddi died of “serious health complications” that arose after being administered the vaccine at a primary health centre in Kalache in Uttara Kannada District.

“Samples of the vaccine are being sent to a laboratory to ascertain whether it was spurious. Meanwhile, District Health Officer has visited the PHC and is looking into the case”, police said.

Three children died yesterday following similar complications after they were administered Hepatitis B vaccination at a local hospital in Hospet in Bellary district.

New Jersey joins national trend, seeks restrictions on vaccine exemptions

Wednesday, September 19, 2012 by: Alan Phillips, J.D.

(NaturalNews) Health freedom-loving New Jerseyans are concerned by State Senator Loretta Weinberg’s Senate Bill No. 1759 (http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2012/Bills/S2000/1759_I1.HTM). Introduced this past March, Senator Weinberg’s bill is a bid to make the exercise of a vaccine religious exemption more difficult for New Jersey parents. If passed, this bill would require parents to state their religious beliefs to exempt their children from vaccines for school enrollment, something the current NJ exemption law doesn’t require.

The New Jersey bill would add New Jersey to a growing list of states that have recently passed laws restricting access to exemptions. Last year, Washington State – and this year, California – passed laws making medical doctors gatekeepers of non-medical exemptions (though the CA governor has not yet signed the CA bill into law). These laws don’t pass the common sense test, let alone formal legal scrutiny. States cannot lawfully put a doctor between a citizen and the exercise of their religious beliefs, which has nothing to do with medicine. The WA and CA laws are simply unconstitutional, in my opinion. Not that that matters to state legislatures. The practical reality is that legislatures can pass any law they have the votes for, Constitutional or not, since technically, laws are not “unconstitutional” unless and until a court later says they are. So, we need activists to challenge these laws in court!

Meanwhile, the New Jersey legislature appears to have approached the matter more carefully than the WA and CA legislatures. Their bill, on its face, does not appear to violate the Constitution. Federal courts have ruled that the First Amendment’s “free exercise” clause allows states to scrutinize vaccine religious exemptions to determine if the exemptions are truly religious in nature and sincerely held. But there are some issues that raise serious concern nevertheless:

1. The law is not clear as to whether or not the exemptions will be scrutinized, and if so, by whom, perhaps leaving that up to the Commissioner of Health and Senior Services, which the law directs to “adopt rules and regulations to effectuate the purposes of this section.” Unless scrutiny is very carefully controlled, the 14th Amendment’s “equal protection” clause may be invoked. That clause requires people similarly situated to be treated equally under the law. If individual schools or local health departments are tasked with scrutinizing religious exemption applicants’ beliefs, that could be problematic. Officials throughout a state simply could not scrutinize exemption applicants’ unique religious beliefs consistently with one another. Assessing religious beliefs for legal purposes is a complex task that, to do properly, would require extensive legal training and experience. If there was a centralized system for scrutiny, such a system might withstand 14th Amendment scrutiny, but would it be practical? Could one office process all exemption claims in a timely fashion? Would that office unwittingly cross First Amendment boundaries by rejecting some qualifying beliefs that the scrutinizer simply didn’t like or understand? This is probably why many states don’t require applicants to state their beliefs. Once the state enters that domain, they embark upon a Constitutional slippery slope that can quickly run afoul of both the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause and the First Amendment’s separation of church and state.

2. By requiring all religious exemption applicants to state their beliefs, the state is effectively declaring that all parents are dishonest and untrustworthy, since the only legitimate purpose of requiring beliefs to be stated is to prevent disingenuous religious exemption claims. But is it appropriate to place restrictions on all of the state’s parents, the majority of whom are honest people, in order to prevent a small percentage of dishonest parents from acting inappropriately? Are parents in New Jersey guilty until proven innocent? Or, if the state actually believes that a significant number of parents are dishonestly exercising religious exemptions, doesn’t that raise serious red flags about the underlying policy itself? If the state is concerned that many parents may falsely claim to have religious objections to get the exemption, shouldn’t the state recognize those citizens’ concerns by expanding the exemption options to include a philosophical exemption, rather than going in exactly the opposite direction by restricting access to the religious exemption?

3. The practical reality is that by imposing the religious beliefs requirement, many who previously had religious exemptions will lose the exemption, and others who would have exercised the exemption may decide not to, or they may fail to meet the state’s new, more restrictive requirements and be rejected when they apply. The more savvy and affluent parents may recognize that there are legal pitfalls to avoid, and hire an attorney to help them secure the exemption. For those “unlucky” parents who can’t afford or find an attorney, or who fail to see the need for one (as one’s chances of rejection are generally much higher for those who approach exemptions on their own, where stating one’s religious beliefs is required), the state’s new beliefs requirement is, in practical effect, placing a financial burden on parents.

New Mexico recently changed its law requiring vaccine religious exemption applicants to state their religious beliefs. If passed, the New Jersey bill would add New Jersey to the growing list of states that now have this requirements such as New York, Illinois, North Carolina, and many others. The bottom line is that vaccine exemption rates are on the rise, and the pharmaceutical industry (along with its cronies in state and federal health agencies) are responding with increased propaganda and well-financed lobbying efforts designed to maximize vaccine distribution and profits.

The national trend of restricting access to vaccine exemptions will continue unless YOU take action to stop it. Get involved – join the NVIC’s Advocacy Portal (www.nvicadvocacy.org) to stay abreast of vaccine billS in your state and across the country, so you can act quickly, easily and promptly to vaccine bills. Visit my Legislative Projects page frequently (http://www.vaccinerights.com/legislativeprojects.html), and join the Pandemic Response Project’s email list at www.pandemicresponseproject.com. We won’t win this war by sitting on the sidelines or wondering if anything we do really matters. The tide is turning – the wrong way. It’s not too late, but it will be soon unless we organize and act NOW.

Attorney Alan Phillips, J.D. is a nationally recognized vaccine rights expert. He advises clients, activists and other attorneys nationally on vaccine exemptions and legislative initiatives. Learn more at www.vaccinerights.com, or email Alan directly at attorney@vaccinerights.com

About the author:
Alan Phillips, Attorney at Law
attorney@vaccinerights.com, 1-828-575-2622
The Pandemic Response Project (www.pandemicresponseproject.com)